Site Loader

No Dt Service regulations of. APSEB. No Dt and. No Dt APSEB pension rules. to APSEB. (Revised) Conduct Regulations -Orders -Issued. -~ ~~-~-~~-~-~ in the service All Deputy General Managers/P&G Services/SPDCL/Tirupati. APSPDCL -APSEB Leave Regulations as adopted by APSPDCL -Grant of Maternity in exercise of the powers referred to in Regulation 41 of APSEB Service.

Author: Murr Gardashura
Country: Uganda
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 2 December 2007
Pages: 321
PDF File Size: 2.89 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.28 Mb
ISBN: 445-5-86284-317-2
Downloads: 66000
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dikasa

Apseb service regulations part iii republican

This objection of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, therefore, falls flat. Under Section of the Income Tax Acttax to be deducted at. Hence, your absence with effect from May 4, F.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. Assistant Engineer in the A. What the Supreme Court has observed in D. The board of directors of a company is primarily responsible for: Delegation of powers to Asst. Concept of fair play in action which swrvice the basis of natural justice must depend upon the particular lis between the parties.

Regulationa of study leave BP Ms. Board to recover any loss sustained by the Board due to non-closing the work orders operated servixe him prior to July 21, The petitioner understood this very well and in his written statements dated April 5, and May 19, he sought to meet Charge VI by stating that he made the following leave applications: Observing that the prime issue for consideration was whether the absence of the petitioner with effect from October 11, for more than one year was unauthorised, the 2nd respondent dealt with that aspect of the matter as follows: In view of all the above foregoing, Sri D.

Holding that the charges were vague and indefinite because of lack of particulars, the Supreme Court observed as follows: In State of U. No Delegation of powers. Holding that the charges were vague and indefinite because of lack of particulars, the Supreme Court observed as follows:. The request is still not considered though the posting orders were cancelled vide SE’s Memo No.


A best practice guide Charity Charity Volunteers A best practice guide 1 Charity Volunteers Charity Most charities rely heavily on volunteers so charities do need to be aware of the legal position of volunteers and review regularly More information. Directing that the candidates who possessed Diploma in Engineering and the candidates who possessed Graduation in Engineering in addition to Diploma in Engineering in relevant Discipline shall be considered for direct recruitment to the post of Sub-Engineer.

One application is dated October 31, seeking leave from October 11, to November 30, on medical grounds as he is undergoing nature cure treatment.

The writ Petition was admitted on July 8, and notice was ordered in W. Delegation of powers to Addl. This period of absence with effect from May 4, F. Supreme Court Of India14 Dec All kinds of increments Pension Manuals. Except to the extent indicated above, the Writ Petition is dismissed.

Regulation of the Regulations dealing with the powers of the appellate authority provides that “an appellate authority or the Eegulations may call for any appeal admissible under these Regulations and may pass such orders thereon as it considers fit.

The learned Standing Counsel for the Board, Mr. As per ESI Act.

In exercise of the powers conferred by the proviso to article of the Constitution and in supersession of More information. Section Licencing of Contractors Xervice contractor shall undertake any work More information.

Its proportionality also cannot be gone into by the Court It is the end-users responsibility to do the following prior to the contractor providing services: After receiving the petitioner’s explanation dated November 14,the 2nd respondent very detailedly considered all aspects of the matter in his final order in Memo dated April 10, deeming the petitioner to have resigned from the Board’s service with effect from October 11, in terms of Regulation 28 3 and thus ceased to be an employee of the Board from October 11, Thus the leave applications so far submitted by the accused are not accepted and he was also declared as unauthorised absentee.

The board terms of reference of the Committee are: He has also not questioned this part of the order in the affidavit and the relief sought by him is only a declaration that “the action of the 2nd respondent in imposing the punishment against the petitioner by way of disciplinary action which is confirmed by the 1st respondent.


It has been provided to assist the Subordinate. In the present case the grounds for each charge were specifically stated. However, the petitioner has not questioned specifically this part of the order in his appeal filed before the 1st respondent. He has also not questioned this part of the order in the affidavit and the relief sought by him is only a declaration that.

B’s service with effect from October 11, F. Monitoring progress towards achieving the objectives and policies. In Surath Chandra’s case supra the facts were stated by the Supreme Court as follows:. Summary Please sign up to view Summary.

Apseb service regulations part iii republican can

On your representation dated December 27, requesting for change in the place of posting you were given an opportunity by the Superintending Engineer twice rsgulations appear before him in person which you have failed to avail the opportunity on both the occasions.

There was no legislation then relating to trade unions More information. The requirements of natural justice depend upon the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the enquiry, the rules servvice which the Tribunal is acting, the subject matter to be dealt with and so on. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policyincluding cookie policy.


For example, I wanted to check myself with Dr. The postal certificate produced by me indicate the same. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division. You have also not closed the work orders operated by you in the Construction Section, Macherla. Restriction on application not-for-profit More information.

It has been observed by this Court in Surath Chandra Chakravarty vs.